|
The Ghost of Sven
10:54 Tue May 23
Re: Do we finish above Chelsea?
|
You could sort of understand Smith going with the back 5 and hoping to snatch a late winner ...which they almost did.
Newcaste had about 25 shots and should have won 3-0 or more.
Obviously against us Maddison & Barnes will come back and they have to go for the win from the start
|
Willtell
10:53 Tue May 23
Re: Do we finish above Chelsea?
|
One of my mates is Chelsea sois already worked all this out. It was really disappointing when Man City reserves could only beat them 1-0…
|
Nagel
10:49 Tue May 23
Re: Do we finish above Chelsea?
|
Since Rodgers got ousted, the "defensive non scoring tactics" of Leicester have seen them score 3 goals against Fulham and 2 vs Wolves and Everton, while conceding an average of two goals a game. The only game they haven't conceded in since then was yesterday, away at "full of pomp" Newcastle.
|
SurfaceAgentX2Zero
10:24 Tue May 23
Re: Do we finish above Chelsea?
|
There's a couple of things to consider here.
Firstly, the 'worst team in London' is an entirely made up thing that doesn't really mean anything (unless we finish above Chelsea, when it will become a matter of hilarity).
Secondly, I don't give a fuck what the press say.
Thirdly, in the unlikely event of us finishing equal on points and a Chelsea fan attempting to gloat about finishing ahead of us, I shall respond, 'What, on goal difference? You sad prick.'
All bases covered, I feel.
|
fraser
10:12 Tue May 23
Re: Do we finish above Chelsea?
|
Leicester have to beat us why will they be using non scoring tactics?
|
|
|
|
